Mandatory detention for all asylum seekers?

Posted on January 17th, 2010 by admin

Australia detains all migrant seeking admission on refuge/asylum rort in secure detention facilities. This ensure no detainee is actually an incorrigible criminal attempting to subvert Australian hospitality of allow the foreigner to reside in their nation- despite Australian taxpayer having no obligation to them or their purported ‘persecutor’ nation to do so.

Why does the UK not adopt these same laws as fellow Commonwealth country?

Even your refuge advocate’s conservative estimate is that one in four ‘refugee’ is criminal.

From perspective of non-signatory to refuge agreement (Indonesia)- why does the UK believe it morally superior to host subversives, provocateurs, seditionists, traitors, minorities and such vile social undesirable- most especially at the cost of the blameless UK citizen-taxpayer?

I do not understand why one would seek to import social undesirable upon your own people.
Surely-it is not beneficial to UK native people and their taxes better spent on them.
Albert I invite you to Indonesia- wher you can witness these ‘persecuted’ who are actually white-collar criminal evading justice, extremist or subversive.
The latter two are dealt with most effectively by military marksmanship.

are you saying that you think the Brits should come first – that tax payers should get value for money and not have to foot the bill for unwanted arrivals – are you implying that it’s unreasonable to have foreign criminals on our streets- YOU ARE!!!! -well would you consider starting your own party because i would definitely vote for you matey until then after decades of voting Tory and then labour – I’m voting bnp

have a star for a valid point well made

6 Responses

  1. arseteroid Says:

    So thats how you get into oz without a job or millions in the bank

    BONZER!!!!

    cheers mate time to crack a coldie and head on down to bonzi beach for a barbie in the Ute with the dingo in the back shiela in the front sucking me tool SWEET!!!
    References :

  2. jason c Says:

    There is no logical reason why we as an island cannot detain illegal immigrants for processing. Just as there is no reason why we should have a health system that is falling to bits, or a criminal justice system that favours the criminal and not the victim, or enough police on the street to prevent crime.
    The whole story about this is money, the government does not want to spend money on low publicity projects like this, when they can instead spend money in full view of the public.
    References :

  3. Albert R Says:

    Why do you itch to punish innocent people for being foreign and persecuted? Even by your own figures, three-quarters of the people you want to persecute have done nothing wrong.

    Were you bullied as a child, perhaps?

    Thanks Will, but I’ve been to Indonesia and I can’t recommend your military solutions to anyone. I’ve also seen an Australian detention centre and the idea of that kind of thing on British soil makes me shudder. We’ve gone to war against nations that do that kind of thing to people.
    References :

  4. st.abbs Says:

    Quite agree, what I can’t get my head round is where do these people get the money from in the beginning?
    How long would it take someone who is living on benefit’s and wanted by the police in this country to save up for a ticket to some far off eastern country,then how would he get through passport control if he is wanted so bad?

    It’s o.k for genuine cases to come in but, they should be kept in some secure place until they are checked out, and why should anyone complain about that, at least they are not in fear of their lives, they’re getting a comfy bed and three meals a day.
    Perhaps the law should change and all these people who say that it is not right to keep them in secure centres, could sign papers saying that they will be responsible for the asylum seekers behaviour and expenses until they have been checked out.
    References :

  5. bringmesunshine Says:

    We don’t jail innocent people in this country.
    References :

  6. gillm Says:

    are you saying that you think the Brits should come first – that tax payers should get value for money and not have to foot the bill for unwanted arrivals – are you implying that it’s unreasonable to have foreign criminals on our streets- YOU ARE!!!! -well would you consider starting your own party because i would definitely vote for you matey until then after decades of voting Tory and then labour – I’m voting bnp

    have a star for a valid point well made
    References :

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Filed under asylum law | 6 Comments »

|
  • Categories

  • Pages

  • Tags

  • Archives

  • Meta

  •